
In short. Yes, it can. DIAC takes foreign companies and individuals, and once even one party is foreign, the case becomes an international commercial arbitration under Section 2(1)(f) of the Arbitration Act. That isn't just a label. It decides which court helps the case along, whether the arbitrator can be of a neutral nationality, which law applies and how the award can be attacked. This guide is for foreign businesses with an Indian counterparty, and for Indian businesses facing a foreign one. Expect 18 months to three years. Start by reading the clause and checking exactly who signed it.
Is this your situation?
- Your company is registered outside India, and the contract with your Indian buyer, supplier or JV partner has a DIAC clause you never thought you'd need.
- You run an Indian business. The other side turns out to be a foreign company, a foreign national, or someone who's lived abroad for years.
- You're an NRI or a foreign national, an Indian firm owes you money, and you want to know whether DIAC will even take your case.
- The contract was signed by the Indian subsidiary of a foreign group. Now nobody on your side can say whether this counts as international.
- Your London or Singapore lawyers want to run the case themselves, or you'd like an arbitrator who isn't Indian.
- You've been asked a simple question by your board: if we win at DIAC, can we actually collect, here or abroad?
Can a foreign party arbitrate at DIAC? The short answer
Yes. The DIAC (Arbitration Proceedings) Rules, 2023 don't restrict the Centre to Indian parties. A foreign company can file there, and so can a foreign national, an Indian citizen living abroad or a foreign government body. Any of them can be the claimant or the respondent. All that's needed is a valid arbitration agreement that sends the dispute to DIAC. Usually that's a clause in the contract with the Indian side. Sometimes the parties agree on DIAC after the fight has already started.
What does change is the legal character of the case. If at least one party is foreign in the way Section 2(1)(f) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) describes, you're in an international commercial arbitration. DIAC cases are normally seated in India, and when they are, Part I of the Act still governs. Indian courts supervise the case, and the award is enforced in India just like a domestic one. But quite a lot moves. The court that hears your applications is different. So is the court that appoints an arbitrator if the parties can't agree, the law that governs the contract, the time limit for the award, and the grounds on which the award can be challenged.
So DIAC is a perfectly workable forum for a cross-border dispute with an Indian side. We see these cases regularly. What follows is what's different, and what a foreign party should sort out early so it doesn't trip over problems that were avoidable.
When does a DIAC case count as international commercial arbitration?
Start with Section 2(1)(f). It covers arbitrations over a legal relationship treated as commercial under Indian law, where at least one party is one of four things. It could be an individual who's a national of, or habitually resident in, another country. It could be a body corporate incorporated outside India. It could be an association or body of individuals whose central management and control is exercised outside India. Or it could be a foreign government. Before the 2015 amendment, the third limb also read 'a company or'. Those words are gone. For a company, the only question now is where it was incorporated.
That throws up some results clients don't expect. Take an Indian private limited company wholly owned by a German parent. It's an Indian party. The Supreme Court said so in TDM Infrastructure v. UE Development India (2008): a company incorporated in India has Indian nationality, whoever its shareholders and directors are. Flip it around. A foreign company trading in India through a branch office is still a body corporate incorporated abroad, because a branch isn't a separate company. And in Amway India Enterprises v. Ravindranath Rao Sindhia (Supreme Court, 2021), the arbitration was held international. Why? The distributors on the other side of Amway's contract ran a proprietorship in India, but they were United States nationals.
For individuals, habitual residence is enough. An Indian citizen who's lived and worked in Dubai for years can make the case international. Consortiums and joint ventures with mixed members are harder. There the test is where central management and control really sits, and that comes out of the consortium documents. When a foreign group first brings a DIAC clause to Advocate B.K. Singh, the first thing he looks at is the signature page. Did the parent abroad sign, or the Indian subsidiary, or both? That one fact decides whether the case is international and which court hears applications. It also decides whether a later award can be enforced against the company that's actually holding the money.
What changes when one party is foreign: domestic and international DIAC cases compared
| Point | Domestic DIAC arbitration | International commercial arbitration at DIAC |
|---|---|---|
| Law that decides the dispute | Indian substantive law (Section 28(1)(a)) | Whatever law the parties chose; if they chose none, the rules the tribunal thinks fit (Section 28(1)(b); Rule 24.1(b)) |
| Court for Section 9 and Section 34 | District Commercial Court or the High Court, depending on the claim value | Always the High Court on its original civil side, whatever the value (Section 2(1)(e)(ii)); in Delhi, the Delhi High Court |
| Court that appoints if the appointment process fails | High Court, under Section 11 | Supreme Court, under Section 11 read with Section 11(12)(a) |
| Arbitrator's nationality | No special rule | Sole or presiding arbitrator can be of a neutral nationality (Section 11(9); proviso to Rule 8.6) |
| Time for the award | 12 months from completion of pleadings, six more by consent, after that only the court can extend (Section 29A) | As fast as possible, with an effort to finish within 12 months (proviso to Section 29A(1)) |
| Patent illegality as a challenge ground | Available, but narrowly (Section 34(2A)) | Not available, since Section 34(2A) applies only to awards that aren't from international commercial arbitrations |
| Arbitrators' fees | DIAC Fee Rules; the Fourth Schedule can matter where the court appointed | DIAC's separate international schedule, in US dollars; the Fourth Schedule doesn't apply (Explanation to Section 11(14)) |
The sections and rules a foreign party will actually run into
Section 2(2) and Section 2(1)(f), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Part I of the Act applies whenever the place of arbitration is in India. Section 2(1)(f) then asks about at least one party: its nationality, residence, place of incorporation or where it's controlled from. That's the whole test for an international commercial arbitration.
Section 2(1)(e)(ii), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
In an international case, 'court' means the High Court using its ordinary original civil jurisdiction over the subject matter. In Delhi, that sends DIAC international applications under Section 9, Section 27, Section 29A and Section 34 straight to the Delhi High Court.
Sections 11(9) and 11(12)(a), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
A sole or third arbitrator in an international case can be of a nationality different from the parties'. And if someone has to ask a court to appoint, the application goes to the Supreme Court. Not the High Court.
Section 28(1)(b), Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
The tribunal decides by the rules of law the parties picked. If they picked a country's law, that means its substantive law, not its conflict-of-laws rules, unless they've said something different.
Section 34(2A) and Section 36, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
An award from an India-seated international arbitration can be set aside only on the Section 34(2) grounds. Patent illegality isn't one of them. Once it's final, it's enforced in India as a decree under Section 36.
Rules 8.6, 22, 23 and 24, DIAC (Arbitration Proceedings) Rules, 2023
Rule 8.6 allows a presiding arbitrator of a nationality other than the parties' in an international case. Under Rule 22, proceedings are in English and the tribunal can ask for translations. Rule 23 makes New Delhi the seat unless the parties expressly agree on another, and lets hearings take place at any suitable venue. Rule 24 covers applicable law.
Which court supports a DIAC international arbitration?
With a New Delhi seat, the Delhi courts supervise. In a domestic case, Section 9 and Section 34 applications go either to the District Judge (Commercial Court) or to the Commercial Division of the Delhi High Court, depending on value. International cases are different. Section 2(1)(e)(ii) sends them to the High Court every time. So a Rs 50 lakh dispute between a Dutch supplier and a Delhi importer gets heard in the Delhi High Court, not at Saket or Tis Hazari. How filing and listing work there is on our page on the Delhi High Court Commercial Division.
Appointment is the second difference. If the DIAC clause works as written, the Centre constitutes the tribunal under its own rules, and no court comes into it. Our guide on how DIAC appoints arbitrators explains the panel and the process. But if appointment breaks down and someone has to go to court, an international case goes to the Supreme Court under Section 11(12)(a). The Delhi High Court can't hear it. And the referral court's job is small. Under Section 11(6A), as read in In re Interplay (seven judges, 2023) and SBI General Insurance v. Krish Spinning (2024), it only checks whether an arbitration agreement exists prima facie.
Interim relief works the same way for foreign parties as for Indian ones. Say you're a foreign claimant and you think the Indian respondent is about to move its assets. You can go to the Delhi High Court under Section 9, before or during the arbitration. Once the tribunal is in place, you can ask it under Section 17. One catch. If the court grants relief before the arbitration starts, the arbitration has to begin within 90 days. The two routes are compared in our guide on interim relief in a DIAC arbitration.
Choosing the arbitrator: nationality and the DIAC panel
Foreign clients often ask us the same thing in the first meeting. Won't the whole tribunal be from the other side's country? The Act deals with this. In an international case, Section 11(9) lets the court appoint a sole or third arbitrator whose nationality differs from the parties'. Rule 8.6 of the DIAC Rules says something similar: where the parties are of different nationalities, the presiding arbitrator may be of yet another. Note the word 'may'. Neither provision makes a neutral nationality compulsory.
Most of DIAC's panel is retired Supreme Court and High Court judges, senior advocates and technical people. For a typical India-related dispute under Indian law, an experienced Indian arbitrator makes good sense, because the arguments will be about Indian contract law and Indian procedure. It's a different picture if the contract is governed by foreign law, or the fight is about trade practice in another country. Then a different profile can help. If you care about the kind of arbitrator you get, put it in the clause. And at the start, ask the Centre how it handles a party nominee who isn't on its panel.
Nationality aside, every arbitrator has to make the Section 12 and Sixth Schedule disclosures. Any relationship listed in the Seventh Schedule makes them ineligible. Found a conflict later? You have 15 days from learning the facts to challenge under Section 13. That's short.
Language, documents and governing law
Rule 22.1 makes English the language of DIAC proceedings. Rule 22.2 lets the tribunal ask for translations of anything in another language. For a Chinese, German or Japanese supplier, that means home-language emails, test reports and board minutes all need translating, and the other side may attack the translations. Budget for certified translations of everything you rely on. Then agree early with the other side how translations will be checked. Settling that in a procedural order costs far less than fighting over a mistranslated word in cross-examination.
On the merits, Section 28(1)(b) lets the parties pick the law of the contract. A lot of India-facing contracts choose Indian law. Some go for English or Singapore law. If a foreign law governs, both sides will usually need evidence or submissions on it, which adds cost. If the contract says nothing, the tribunal applies whatever rules it thinks appropriate. That's harder to predict. The law of the contract, the law of the arbitration agreement and the seat are three separate choices, and a good clause handles each one; our guide on the DIAC arbitration clause walks through the drafting.
The seat needs its own mention. Under Rule 23.1, New Delhi is the seat unless the parties expressly agree otherwise. If a clause adopts DIAC rules but names some other seat, that seat's courts supervise. If it names only a venue, BGS SGS Soma JV v. NHPC (2019) applies: the Supreme Court held that a named venue is ordinarily the seat unless something points the other way. Read the clause line by line before you file anything.
Can foreign lawyers appear for a party at DIAC?
Yes, within limits. In Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji (2018) the Supreme Court held that foreign lawyers could come to India temporarily to advise clients in international commercial arbitration, subject to the Bar Council of India's rules and code of conduct. The Bar Council notified rules for registering and regulating foreign lawyers and foreign law firms in March 2023, and amended them in May 2025. Roughly, a registered foreign lawyer may act in international arbitrations in India for clients based abroad where foreign or international law is involved. Lawyers who fly in and out may advise on foreign or international law for limited periods. Do check the current rules. What a foreign lawyer can do in an arbitration under Indian law is narrow.
Indian courts are a different matter. Foreign lawyers can't appear there at all. Every Section 9, Section 11, Section 29A, Section 34 and execution proceeding in India needs advocates enrolled here. So most foreign parties end up with a two-office team. Home counsel looks after the commercial relationship, the foreign-law points and the client's internal sign-offs. Indian counsel runs the arbitration and every court step.
On cross-border files, Advocate B.K. Singh likes to agree one document index with foreign co-counsel in the first two weeks. One numbering system. Translations stapled to originals. One person who decides what goes in the bundle. Fix that early and the statement of claim, the evidence affidavits and any later Section 34 or execution petition all cite the same document numbers. Nothing goes missing between two offices five and a half hours apart.
How a foreign company starts or answers a DIAC arbitration, step by step
DIAC runs the same procedure for foreign and Indian parties. What we've added below are the points that bite when one side is overseas.
Pin down the parties and the clause
Write down the exact contracting entities and where each is incorporated. Then read what the clause says about DIAC, the seat, governing law and the number of arbitrators. That tells you whether the case is international and which courts you'll be dealing with.
Send the notice invoking arbitration
Under Section 21, the arbitration commences when the respondent receives the request to refer the dispute. Send it to every postal and email address in the contract. Keep proof of delivery, because limitation is counted from that date.
File the Request for Arbitration at DIAC
The Request goes in under Rule 4, with the contract, the notice and the administrative cost. Our guide on starting an arbitration at DIAC lists what it must contain. A respondent answers with its Response under Rule 5.
Sort out authority and payments
You'll need a board resolution and a power of attorney for whoever signs pleadings and instructs counsel. If they're signed abroad, get them notarised and apostilled. Work out how DIAC deposits will be paid from abroad, and keep every bank advice.
Take part in constituting the tribunal
Nominate within the time DIAC allows. If the clause provides for a sole arbitrator appointed by DIAC, leave it to the Centre. Want a neutral presiding arbitrator? Say so now, not later.
Plead, translate and prove
File the statement of claim or defence with translations attached. Add evidence affidavits from witnesses who can attend in person or by video, and any expert evidence on foreign law. Section 23(4) expects pleadings done within six months of the tribunal's appointment.
Think about enforcement on day one
Find out where the other side's assets are. Assets in India mean enforcement under Section 36. If they're abroad, check how that country enforces an Indian award and keep the papers it'll want.
DIAC international arbitration: typical time and costs by stage
| Stage | Typical time | Costs (general terms) |
|---|---|---|
| Notice invoking arbitration and Request to DIAC | 2 to 6 weeks to prepare; longer if documents need translating | DIAC administrative cost; international cases follow a separate US dollar schedule, so check the current figure |
| Response and constitution of the tribunal | Response within 30 days of getting the Request; tribunal usually in place in 1 to 3 months | Arbitrators' fee deposits as DIAC assesses them, normally split equally |
| Pleadings, including any counter claim | Up to about 6 months from the tribunal's appointment (Section 23(4)) | Translations and, if foreign law governs, foreign-law opinions |
| Evidence and hearings | 6 to 12 months, depending on witnesses and travel | Hearing room charges, travel, video link arrangements |
| Award | As fast as possible, aiming at 12 months from completed pleadings; DIAC Rule 31 also fixes an outer period | Rest of the arbitrators' fees, released in stages by DIAC |
| Section 34 challenge in the Delhi High Court | Must be filed within 3 months of receiving the award, plus up to 30 days for sufficient cause; the hearing often takes a year or more | Court fee on the current Delhi schedule |
| Enforcement in India or abroad | In India, a few months to over a year depending on assets; abroad, it depends on the foreign court | Execution court fee, plus translation and authentication costs abroad |
Hearings, travel and video conference
DIAC sits in the Delhi High Court premises. But Rule 23.2 lets the tribunal hold hearings and meetings anywhere it finds suitable, after consulting the parties, and Rule 26.1(a) allows hearings in person or by video conference. For a foreign party, two stages matter most here: cross-examination of its own witnesses, and final arguments. Procedural hearings are often virtual anyway. Check current practice with the Centre, and see our guide on where DIAC sits and how its hearings run.
If a witness is flying to Delhi, confirm the right visa category with the Indian mission well ahead. The wrong one can cause trouble at immigration. Where travel is hard, ask the tribunal early for video evidence and agree a protocol. Who sits in the room with the witness? How are documents put to them? What happens when the link drops, as it will at least once? Time zones matter too. A witness in California cross-examined at 10.30 am Delhi time is answering questions late at night. That shows.
Travel, interpreters and video links are recoverable as costs of the arbitration if you win and the tribunal awards costs under Section 31A. Keep the bills.
Getting paid: enforcing a DIAC award with a foreign party involved
Suppose the foreign party wins against an Indian company. The award is enforced in India under Section 36 like a decree, through execution in the court that has jurisdiction over the debtor's assets. Filing a Section 34 challenge doesn't stay it automatically. The court usually asks for a deposit or security before it grants a stay. Execution is covered in our guide on enforcing a DIAC award. Once you've recovered the money, sending it abroad goes through an authorised dealer bank, which will want the award and supporting papers. Check the current foreign exchange requirements, and get tax advice on whether any part of it (interest, for instance) needs tax deducted before it leaves India.
Now reverse it. The Indian party wins, and the foreign party has nothing in India. The award then has to be enforced wherever the assets are. Most countries enforce Indian awards under the New York Convention, which India has joined. But each country has its own procedure, and you may need an authenticated copy, translations and a local lawyer. Our guide on certified copies of DIAC orders and awards explains how to get the papers ready.
Indian exporters chasing an overseas buyer often have choices besides arbitration. Export credit insurance is one. Bank instruments are another. Suing in the buyer's own country is a third. Our guide on how to recover payment from an overseas buyer sets them side by side.
Is DIAC the right choice for a foreign party, or should the seat be abroad?
DIAC works well for a foreign party when the dispute is about performance in India, the counterparty's assets are in India, and Indian law governs the contract. You enforce in India without first having a foreign award recognised, Indian courts supervise, and the costs follow a scale built for Indian disputes. Think of a European supplier that sold machinery to a factory in Manesar. An award it can take straight to execution against the buyer's Indian assets is worth a great deal to it.
A foreign seat such as Singapore can make more sense in other cases: where a foreign party wants neutral ground, plans to enforce in several countries, or is dealing with an Indian company that keeps assets abroad. A foreign-seated award comes back to India as a foreign award under Part II of the Act, with its own short list of grounds for refusal. We've compared the three centres properly in our guide on DIAC, MCIA or SIAC, so we won't repeat it here.
Papers a foreign party should have ready for a DIAC case
- The foreign company's certificate of incorporation and constitutional documents, so nobody can argue about where it's incorporated
- A board resolution and power of attorney for the authorised signatory, notarised and either apostilled or legalised
- The signed contract with its arbitration clause, every amendment, and the purchase orders and work orders under it
- All correspondence with the Indian side, with certified translations of whatever isn't in English
- Invoices, shipping papers, acceptance certificates and the bank records of what was remitted
- Your notice invoking arbitration, and proof it reached every address in the contract
- What you know about the Indian party: registered office, directors, and any assets you've spotted in India
- A short note on the governing law in the contract and, if it's foreign law, who'll advise on it
- How you'll pay DIAC deposits from abroad, and which bank will send the money
A made-up example: a Singapore software firm and a Gurugram logistics company
This is an invented example, not a real client. A Singapore company licensed warehouse software to a Gurugram logistics firm. The contract was under Indian law, with a DIAC clause and a sole arbitrator. After complaining about bugs, the Gurugram firm stopped paying licence fees of about USD 350,000. The Singapore parent had signed the contract itself, not its Indian subsidiary. So the dispute was an international commercial arbitration.
Its Indian counsel sent a notice invoking arbitration to the Gurugram firm's registered office and to the email addresses in the contract, then filed the Request with DIAC. The Centre constituted the tribunal in roughly two months. Then the Gurugram firm started moving its main warehousing contracts to a group company. The Singapore company applied to the Delhi High Court under Section 9. Because the arbitration was international, the High Court heard it whatever the amount involved. The court told the firm to keep a sum in a fixed deposit while the arbitration ran.
The Singapore witnesses gave evidence by video. Some of their technical emails were in Mandarin, but those had been translated at the outset under an agreed protocol, so cross-examination stuck to the facts. The award came about 20 months after the Request. The respondent's assets and the fixed deposit were all in India. Once the time for challenge ran out, the Singapore company could enforce under Section 36 with no foreign recognition step at all.
Mistakes foreign parties make in DIAC arbitrations
- Going after the wrong company. An award against the Indian subsidiary doesn't bind the foreign parent, or the other way round, unless the facts and the law allow it. Name the party that signed and the party that has the assets.
- Treating it as a domestic case. A Section 9 application filed in a district court, or a Section 11 petition filed in the High Court, when the case is international, just burns weeks.
- Forgetting Indian limitation. Section 43 applies the Limitation Act, 1963 to arbitrations. A foreign claimant who sits on the claim for more than three years after the default can lose it entirely.
- Translating at the last minute. Getting documents translated the week before a hearing is asking for fights over accuracy, and for adjournments.
- Leaning only on foreign counsel. Every court step in India needs Indian advocates. Bring them in before the first urgent application, not halfway through it.
- Not thinking about enforcement. An award is worth only what it can reach. Find the assets before you choose the forum and the relief.
What to do this week
Read the clause, then the signature page. Note down who the parties are, where each one is incorporated or lives, what the clause says about DIAC, the seat, governing law and the number of arbitrators, and when the default in payment or performance happened. Pull together the contract, invoices and correspondence. Mark the documents that will need translating. If you think assets may move, ask Indian counsel now whether a Section 9 application should go in.
The full DIAC process, from Request to award, is on our DIAC arbitration lawyer page, which explains how the firm handles claims and defences at the Centre, including for parties based abroad. If your question is about arbitration in general rather than DIAC, our network site arbitrationlawyer.in covers that.
You can send your contract and correspondence to Advocate B.K. Singh's team through the contact page, whether you want them looked at before you invoke DIAC or answer a Request, or just want to hear about changes in the law on foreign parties in Indian arbitration.
Frequently asked questions
Does a foreign party need an Indian address to file at DIAC?
No. You can file with your overseas address and an email for service, through Indian counsel. It does help to give the Centre an Indian address for service care of your counsel. Notices and the award then reach someone quickly.
Is the Indian subsidiary of a foreign company a foreign party?
No. A company incorporated in India is an Indian party even if every share is held abroad. The Supreme Court said so in TDM Infrastructure (2008). The case becomes international only when a party incorporated or resident outside India is involved.
Can a DIAC arbitration with a foreign party run entirely online?
Possibly. Rule 26.1(a) of the DIAC Rules allows hearings in person or by video conference, and lots of procedural hearings are virtual already. Whether evidence and final arguments also go online is up to the tribunal and the parties. Raise it early and agree a protocol.
What currency are claims and DIAC fees paid in on an international case?
Your claim can be in the contract currency. DIAC has a separate fee schedule for international commercial arbitrations, in US dollars. Check the current schedule and how to pay with the Centre before you file.
Can the Indian party challenge the award as patently illegal?
Not if it's an international commercial arbitration seated in India. Section 34(2A), the patent illegality ground, applies only to awards other than international commercial arbitrations. The rest of Section 34(2), public policy included, still applies.
Does Section 12A pre-institution mediation apply before a DIAC arbitration?
No. Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act is for commercial suits, not arbitrations. You can still try mediation at DIAC voluntarily, before or during the arbitration. Some parties do.
Can an NRI start a DIAC arbitration against an Indian firm?
Yes. If you're habitually resident outside India, even as an Indian citizen, the arbitration is international under Section 2(1)(f). The normal DIAC process applies, with the international differences we've described above.
Will a DIAC award be recognised in the other party's country?
Usually, if that country has joined the New York Convention. But recognition follows that country's procedure and its own limited grounds for refusal. Before you start, ask a local lawyer there what papers and authentication the court will want.
