
In short. Defending a summary suit takes two filings, each with a 10-day clock. First you enter appearance within 10 days of being served. Then, within 10 days of the summons for judgment, you apply for leave to defend, backed by an affidavit that shows a real, triable defence. A written statement on its own won't do. This guide is for businesses and proprietors in Delhi NCR who've been served with an Order XXXVII summons. The leave stage usually runs a few months. But the first two weeks decide most of it. Start pulling documents today.
Is this your situation?
- A thick bundle arrived by speed post, and the first page says "Under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908".
- A supplier you've dealt with for years has sued your firm for a round figure, plus 24 percent interest you never agreed to.
- You returned half the lot. Or you already paid by RTGS. Or the rate was never settled. Either way, you don't owe what they say.
- Your lawyer filed the appearance, and now a fresh paper called a "summons for judgment" has landed.
- The same cheque has also turned into a Section 138 complaint in a magistrate's court.
- You're a director or partner, and they've named you personally next to the company.
- You're torn between fighting, settling, or putting part of the money in court to buy time.
How do you defend a summary suit?
You have to earn the right to defend. In an ordinary suit the defendant files a written statement as a matter of course. Not here. Under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), you can contest only if the court gives you leave, and reaching that point takes two filings with a ten-day limit on each. The appearance comes first, within 10 days of service of the summons. The leave to defend application comes second, within 10 days of service of the plaintiff's summons for judgment.
The real fight is the leave application. Your affidavit with it has to set out facts that show a genuine, triable defence. Then the court picks one of three paths. It lets you defend with no conditions, or lets you defend only if you deposit money or give security, or refuses leave and decrees the suit. How we put these applications together is on our page on leave to defend in a summary suit.
Defendants who treat the first date as a formality, or file a two-line denial, usually lose at the leave stage. Those who use the twenty-odd days properly, gathering papers and reading the plaint line by line, very often get to trial. This guide is about that difference.
The first 48 hours after the papers arrive
Note the date the summons reached you, and how. Speed post, courier, email, bailiff. That date starts your first ten-day clock, and if it came more than one way, take the earliest. Then look at the title of the plaint. A genuine summary suit carries the words "Under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908" below the suit number. The summons itself should be in the special summary suit form, the one that warns you about the ten days.
Next, sit down with the plaint, every annexure, and your own accounts open next to them. Go slowly. Mark each document the plaintiff relies on. The contract or purchase order. The invoices. Any ledger confirmation your staff signed. A promissory note, a cheque, a guarantee. For each, ask yourself whether it's genuine, whether it's complete, and whether it really says what the plaintiff says it does.
Don't phone the plaintiff and chat about the dues. A WhatsApp message like "we will clear your amount by Diwali" can be read out against you at your own leave hearing. If talking is worthwhile, do it through your advocate, or in writing marked without prejudice. And don't assume nothing will happen because the dispute is old or the amount is small. Stay away from a summary suit and you get a decree. We've explained that in our guide on what happens if the defendant does not appear.
Defending a summary suit, one step at a time
This is the order things happen in a commercial court in Delhi, or in Ghaziabad, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Gurugram or Faridabad. Every limit is enforced strictly, so plan backwards from the dates.
Enter appearance within 10 days of service
File a memo of appearance with your vakalatnama, yourself or through an advocate, and give an address where notices can be served on you. Send notice of the appearance to the plaintiff's advocate the same day. Under Rule 3(2), papers delivered at that address later count as served. So give one somebody actually checks.
Start drafting before the summons for judgment comes
Next the plaintiff serves a summons for judgment, and from then you've got only ten days. Use the gap to collect papers, reconcile the account and draft the affidavit. Plenty of defendants waste this time waiting for the next court date, just as the clock is about to start.
Read the summons for judgment closely
It comes with the plaintiff's affidavit saying the claim is right and that, in its belief, you have no defence. Note the date it was served on you. Check the affidavit for any new figures or documents that weren't in the plaint.
File the leave to defend application within 10 days
File it with a supporting affidavit that sets out your defence as facts, attaches your documents, and answers every one of the plaintiff's documents. If you admit part of the claim, say so. Leave can't be granted until the admitted amount is deposited.
Raise any arbitration objection at the same time
If the contract has an arbitration clause, file under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before your leave application or together with it. Never after. A merits defence filed first can count as your first statement on the substance of the dispute, and then the objection's gone.
Argue the leave application
The plaintiff replies, and the court hears both sides on whether your defence raises a triable issue. You'll be asked about your documents. Not your adjectives. The order may grant leave outright, grant it on a deposit or security, or refuse it.
If leave is granted, defend it like a regular suit
File your written statement within the time the court gives, with any counterclaim and full disclosure of documents. The written statement deadline in a commercial suit is strict. Put it in the diary the day leave is granted.
Before anything else, is this really a summary suit?
When a client brings in a summary suit, Advocate B.K. Singh doesn't start with the merits. He starts with the gate. Does this claim belong under Order XXXVII at all? The Order is limited to suits on bills of exchange, cheques and promissory notes, and suits for a debt or liquidated money demand arising on a written contract, an enactment or a guarantee. You'd be surprised how many plaints stretch that list.
Watch for a few signs. The plaint asks for damages, lost profit, a penalty or compensation on top of the price. The contract it relies on isn't signed, or it's just a quotation you never accepted in writing. The interest rate claimed doesn't appear in a single document you agreed to. Or the claim depends on work the plaintiff says it did, and you dispute what that work was worth. Any one of these can be argued as a reason the suit can't go the summary route. At the very least it's a triable issue that gets you leave.
Then test the foundations. In a commercial suit, Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 requires mediation before filing, unless the plaintiff genuinely wanted urgent interim relief, and a plaint filed without it can be rejected. (Our guide on mediation before a summary suit explains this.) Check limitation from the invoice due dates or the date of the loan, keeping in mind that a written acknowledgment or part payment restarts the period. Check territorial jurisdiction. Look for an exclusive jurisdiction clause or an arbitration clause. For a summary suit defendant, these aren't technicalities. They're often your cleanest triable issues.
The tests a court applies to your leave application
Order XXXVII Rule 3(5), CPC
Leave can't be refused unless the court is satisfied either that your facts don't show a substantial defence, or that the defence you intend to raise is frivolous or vexatious. And if you admit part of the claim, you won't get leave until you've deposited the admitted amount in court.
IDBI Trusteeship Services v. Hubtown Ltd (Supreme Court, 2016)
Here the Supreme Court set out the tests for leave again, as they stand after the 1976 amendment. Show a substantial defence and you get unconditional leave. A fair or bona fide defence that raises a triable issue ordinarily gets unconditional leave too. If the court doubts your good faith, or your defence is plausible but unlikely, it can attach conditions about time, the mode of trial, or paying money into court. Refusal is kept for defences that are frivolous or vexatious.
B.L. Kashyap and Sons v. JMS Steels and Power Corporation (Supreme Court, 2022)
Granting leave is the normal rule, the Court said again, and refusing it is the exception. Refusal is for cases where the defendant has practically no defence and can't show even a hint of a triable issue.
Order XXXVII Rule 3(7), CPC
Show sufficient cause and the court can forgive a late appearance or a late leave application. Think of it as a safety net with holes in it. It's not a plan.
Your reply to a summary suit: the leave to defend affidavit
In a normal suit, your answer to the plaint is the written statement. In a summary suit, your first real answer is the affidavit supporting the leave application. Judges read it far more carefully than most written statements ever get read. On that one document, usually with no oral evidence, they decide whether you get a trial at all.
Write it in dates and documents. A good affidavit tells the story in order. When the contract was made, and on what terms. What was supplied or lent. What went wrong, and when you complained. What you paid, and when. What, if anything, you actually owe. Every fact should point to an annexure, whether that's an email rejecting a lot, a quality report, a debit note, a bank statement showing a payment the plaintiff has ignored, or a letter disputing the rate. A fact with no paper behind it isn't useless. It's weaker.
Take on each of the plaintiff's documents by name. Did your accountant sign a ledger confirmation? Then don't pretend he didn't. Explain what it covered and why that balance isn't the amount now being claimed. If there's a cheque in the suit, say what it was given for, with whatever shows that. If you accept part of the claim, say so and put a figure on it. Judges notice dodging. And the proviso to Rule 3(5) will make you deposit whatever you admit before leave is granted anyway.
Leave out the adjectives and accusations. "False", "fabricated", "malicious": these words achieve nothing unless the facts behind them are set out. Put your legal objections (limitation, jurisdiction, no mediation, the claim not being liquidated) in a short section of their own. The judge should be able to see them at a glance.
Defences that usually raise a triable issue
- You rejected the goods, or got short supply, and recorded it at the time. A rejection email, a GRN showing less received, or a third-party test report dated before the fight started is strong. The same complaint showing up for the first time in your leave application is weak.
- You've already paid, or you're owed a credit. Think bank entries, credit notes, TDS you deducted and deposited, or agreed discounts the plaintiff never credited.
- The amount isn't a fixed sum. If it turns on measurement, pricing linked to quality, or damages, the claim either falls outside Order XXXVII or needs a trial.
- The terms were never agreed. Interest, delivery dates or price escalation the plaintiff relies on, which appear only in its own invoices and which you never accepted.
- They've sued the wrong person. A director dragged in personally over the company's debt without any personal guarantee. Or a proprietor sued for something a separate entity bought.
- It's time-barred. The invoices were over three years old when the suit was filed, with no written acknowledgment or part payment inside that period, even after leaving out the time spent in Section 12A mediation.
- The cheque was security, and you have the papers to show it. This can be a triable issue if the transaction documents show the cheque was given as security and the liability it covered never arose. Saying so without paper usually fails.
Defences courts usually see through
Some defences turn up in nearly every summary suit and convince almost nobody. First, the bald denial: "the defendant denies that any amount is due". Second, the quality complaint invented after the suit was filed, when there's no email, no goods sent back and no debit note in the months before. Judges see both every week. They usually lead to leave being refused, or to a heavy deposit condition.
Third, the claim that a ledger confirmation or acknowledgment was signed "under pressure" or "in good faith for audit purposes", with nothing to support it. Fourth, disputing the account without producing your own ledger. If your books show a different balance, attach them and explain the gap line by line. If they show the same balance, expect the court to ask why you're disputing it at all.
None of this means a defendant with a thin file should give up. It means the defence has to be honest about what it can prove. Admit Rs 6 lakh and properly dispute Rs 14 lakh, and you're far more likely to get leave on the disputed part than with a blanket denial your own documents contradict.
What the court can do at the leave hearing
| Outcome | When you'd usually see it | What it means for you |
|---|---|---|
| Unconditional leave | A substantial defence, or a genuine triable issue shown on the documents | The suit goes to trial like any ordinary suit; you file a written statement and can bring a counterclaim |
| Leave if you deposit money or give security | The defence is plausible but doubtful, or you've admitted part of the claim | Comply in the time allowed, or the plaintiff gets judgment forthwith under Rule 3(6)(b) |
| Deposit of the admitted amount | You've admitted any part of the claim | You get leave on the rest only once the admitted sum is deposited |
| Leave refused | The defence is frivolous or vexatious, or your own documents knock it down | A decree follows; in a commercial suit you can appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act within 60 days |
| Leave for some defendants and not others | Say, a director who never gave a guarantee | That defendant goes to trial; the others may face a decree |
The summons for judgment: the ten days that matter most
The summons for judgment is the plaintiff formally asking you to show why judgment shouldn't be passed against you. It's in a prescribed form (Form No. 4A in Appendix B of the CPC). It's returnable not less than ten days from service, and it comes with the plaintiff's affidavit verifying the claim. What's in it is explained in our guide on the summons for judgment in a summary suit.
Why it matters to you is simple. Your ten days to apply for leave run from service of this summons. Miss them and Rule 3(6)(a) entitles the plaintiff to judgment forthwith. All you're left with is an application under Rule 3(7) to excuse the delay, and that depends on the court buying your reason. Delhi courts have been firm about this window, especially in commercial suits, where the entire Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is built around fixed timelines.
One practical thing. The summons for judgment often goes to your advocate at the address in your appearance, or comes by email. Make sure whoever gets it tells you that same day.
After leave: written statement, counterclaim and trial
Once you have leave, the suit runs as a regular commercial suit, and the court fixes time for your written statement. In commercial suits the 120-day outer limit is strict. In SCG Contracts v. K.S. Chamankar (2019), the Supreme Court held that once it expires, the right to file is gone. So don't treat leave as a breather. There's more in our guide on the 120-day written statement deadline.
Your written statement needs a statement of truth, and under the amended Order XI it has to come with every document in your power and possession. If you have a counterclaim, now's the time. It might be for damage caused by defective goods, or for money you overpaid. A counterclaim is tried along with the suit. It can shift the commercial balance of the whole case.
If your leave was conditional, the deposit usually sits in court, often in an interest-bearing fixed deposit, until the suit is decided. Win at trial and it comes back to you. Lose and it goes towards the decree. For detail, see our guides on conditional leave and deposits and on when unconditional leave is granted.
When a cheque bounce case is running too
Lots of summary suits are filed on a bounced cheque, and that same cheque often leads to a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 before a magistrate. Now you're defending two cases over one transaction, in two courts, under two different standards. In the criminal case, the law presumes the cheque was issued for a debt, and it's on you to rebut that. In the summary suit, the question is whether you can show a triable issue.
Above everything, stay consistent. Whatever you say in your leave affidavit will be produced in the criminal case. Whatever you tell the magistrate will turn up in the civil court. If your defence is that the cheque was security for a future supply, it has to be put the same way, with the same documents, in both. The criminal court can also order interim compensation of up to 20 percent under Section 143A. Our network's cheque bounce defence team handles the criminal side. Plan both cases together from week one.
Should you defend, deposit or settle?
It's a business call as much as a legal one. And it's better made in the first fortnight than after a deposit order. Ask yourself three things. How much of the claim do your own documents admit? How good is your evidence on the rest? And what does it cost you to have that money locked in court for two or three years while the suit is tried?
If the papers support most of the claim, a negotiated settlement with instalments, recorded as a consent decree or through mediation, often costs less than a conditional leave order plus the interest that keeps running. If the dispute is real and documented, defend. A conditional order isn't a defeat. And if your defence is really a request for time, tell the plaintiff early. Many creditors would rather take structured payments than face the uncertainty of execution. Our guide on settling a commercial suit without losing your rights explains how to record a settlement safely.
When Advocate B.K. Singh advises a defendant at this point, he usually puts the plaintiff's papers and the client's papers side by side on one sheet, invoice by invoice. The figure that's genuinely in dispute is often much smaller than the claim. Build the defence, and any settlement, around that figure. Not the suit amount.
What to collect before the leave application is drafted
Your side of the deal
- The purchase orders, contract or loan agreement, as you have them
- Your own ledger account of the plaintiff, covering the whole period
- Bank statements showing each payment you made to the plaintiff
- Credit notes, debit notes and TDS certificates
- Your GST returns, showing what you booked as purchases from the plaintiff
Proof that there's a real dispute
- Rejection emails, quality complaints and test reports, all with dates
- Goods received notes, delivery challans and e-way bills
- WhatsApp chats exported with dates, plus a certificate under Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 for electronic records
- Any letter or email where you objected to the interest, rates or quantities
Court and procedure papers
- The summons, and the envelope or email that shows when it was served
- The Section 12A mediation notice and report, if you got any
- A board resolution or authority letter for whoever will sign the affidavit
- The arbitration or jurisdiction clause, if your contract has one
- A copy of any Section 138 complaint filed on the same cheque
Time and costs of defending a summary suit
| Stage | Usual time | Costs apart from lawyer fees |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Within 10 days of being served with summons | Vakalatnama with welfare stamp, plus filing and copying charges |
| Summons for judgment served on you | Usually a few weeks after appearance | None |
| Leave to defend application | Within 10 days of service of the summons for judgment | Court fee on the application under the state schedule; notarisation and copies |
| Reply, rejoinder and the leave hearing | Commonly 2 to 6 months, depending on how busy the court's board is | Very little by way of court costs |
| Deposit or security, if the court orders it | Usually 2 to 8 weeks from the order | The deposit itself, and bank guarantee charges if you give a guarantee |
| Written statement and trial once leave is granted | Written statement within the time fixed (outer limit 120 days); trial commonly 1 to 3 years | Witness and document costs; under Section 35 CPC as amended for commercial suits, the losing side can be made to pay actual costs |
| Appeal if leave is refused | Within 60 days of the decree | Court fee on the appeal; you may have to deposit money to get a stay |
A made-up example: an Okhla garment exporter sued by a fabric mill
This is an invented case. A fabric mill sues a garment exporter in Okhla for Rs 42 lakh under Order XXXVII. It relies on eleven invoices, a purchase order, and a ledger confirmation the exporter's accountant signed in April. The plaint asks for interest at 24 percent. That rate appears only in small print on the back of the mill's invoices.
The exporter files its appearance on day eight. While it waits for the summons for judgment, its team reconciles the account, and the picture changes. Three invoices worth Rs 11 lakh are admitted and unpaid. Fine. Two lots worth Rs 19 lakh were rejected by email within a week of delivery, there's a lab report showing shrinkage beyond the agreed tolerance, and the fabric is still sitting in the exporter's godown. And Rs 12 lakh was in fact paid by RTGS in May, after the ledger confirmation. The mill never gave credit for it.
The leave affidavit sets out all three heads, attaching the emails, the lab report, the bank statement and the godown stock register, and objects to 24 percent interest as never agreed. On these facts, a court could well grant leave on the Rs 19 lakh dispute on condition that the admitted Rs 11 lakh is deposited, and treat the Rs 12 lakh payment as a clear answer to that part. What the exporter really faces at trial, then, is a quality dispute it documented from day one.
Choosing who defends the suit, and what to do this week
The limits are counted in days. So the first real test for any advocate you approach is whether they can get through the plaint, your accounts and your documents fast enough to file appearance and prepare a leave application on time. Ask how they'll deal with the summons for judgment. Ask if they see any objection to the suit going the summary route, and what they need from you. Fees are a separate conversation; at our office they're discussed at the first meeting and agreed in writing, stage by stage. How we approach defence work in general is on our commercial suit defence page, and this particular stage is covered on the leave to defend page.
This week, then. Note the date of service and count ten days. Get the appearance filed. Pull out your ledger, your bank statements and every email about the disputed supplies or loan. Check the contract for an arbitration clause. If there's a Section 138 complaint on the same cheque, put both files on one desk.
Want your summons and papers looked at before the ten days run out? Send them to Advocate B.K. Singh's team through the contact page.
Frequently asked questions
Can I file a written statement instead of a leave to defend application?
No. In a summary suit you've no right to file a written statement until the court grants leave. One filed without leave isn't a defence at all, and the plaintiff can still ask for judgment if your leave application doesn't come in on time.
What if I received the summons for judgment but not the original summons?
File your appearance straight away. Then, within ten days of the summons for judgment, file the leave application along with an application explaining what happened. If the original summons was never served, say so and prove it. It may help you. Just don't let it hold up the leave application.
Will I have to deposit the full claim to get leave?
Not necessarily. Courts order deposits when the defence looks doubtful or part of the claim is admitted, and how much depends on how strong the defence is. A well-documented defence on a disputed portion often gets leave on that portion with no deposit at all.
Can a director be made to pay a company's debt in a summary suit?
Only if there's a basis for it, like a personal guarantee or a personal promissory note. If you've been sued just because you signed purchase orders on the company's behalf, you've got a strong point for the leave application.
Does an arbitration clause stop the summary suit?
It can. You'd need to file under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in time, which means before or with your first statement on the substance of the dispute. Argue the merits first and you may lose the objection.
Can I settle after filing the leave application?
Yes. You can settle at any stage, by talking directly, through court-annexed mediation, or by a compromise recorded under Order XXIII CPC. A consent decree with instalments is common. Once the terms are recorded, the leave application can be withdrawn.
What happens if leave is refused?
The court decrees the claim, and the plaintiff can execute it. In a commercial suit you can appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 within 60 days. The appeal court may want a deposit before it stays execution, though.
How long does the whole defence take?
The leave stage usually takes a few months from appearance. If you get leave, the suit goes to trial like any regular commercial suit. In Delhi NCR that often means another one to three years, depending on the court and how both sides run the case.
